Dear Luisma,
I have to say that I disagree with the
transcription and translation offered.
Most funerary inscriptions contain the minimum of
a personal name, which is usually composed of two separate elements (some of
which themselves are compounds), eg BALKE-ADIN "piece of
gold/intellect", SOSIN-BIUR "straight/twisted", or ARS-PIN
"bear/genuine".
Sometimes there is a message, and often the words eban
or ebanen, "here" and "in here"
respectively, are placed immediately after the name of the deceased.
The difficulty here is the use of the m-sign
(shaped like a "V"), which is problematic because it is
multi-aspect. It is syllabic (which means it incorporates a vowel), but unlike
other syllabic signs, it may incorporate any vowel, either posterior or both
anterior and posterior (but never only anterior, because m cannot
occur finally or before a consonant).
So MI is actually M(A)I, mai, which means
"inscription" (the m-sign incorporates a posterior a).
The word had an earlier meaning "slab used to carve an inscription",
but came to refer to the inscriptions itself (it is also used on imprints).
The Basque cognate is mai/mahai "table". The shift in
meaning can be compared with Latin tabula "panel used to carve
an inscription", which in English is "table". Sometimes mai
appears as nai - the n-sign is not syllabic, so the a
is represented.
So what is NMKE/GE? This is the message, and is
really M(U)GE(I) "to the boundaries". On another funerary
inscription we have IGON M(U)GEI "to ascend to the boundaries" (the m-sign
incorporates a posterior u).
What is the n-sign doing here?
Occasionally an n-sign is placed anterior to the m-sign.
This is so on the Liria vase, where we have NMB(A)R TE "and Nabar".
There are two possible explanations: (1) the n-sign indicates that
there is no anterior vowel incorporated in the following m-sign; (2)
in the Levantine dialect it seems there was a great deal of interchangibility
between initial m and initial n (as in m(a)i and nai).
This is also found in Basque, where nerabe and mirabe both
have the same meaning "youth, servant", and are actually the same
word (in Iberian, this appears in the inverted form, abiner); and naiz
is sometimes rendered maiz.
Why is the final i missing on mugei?
This is probably because it runs into the next word, the personal name
exhibiting initial i, and the i is not repeated.
The first element of the personal name is clearly Ildir
"highways, crossroads" (ildi + plural r). The
second element comprises a plus an undeciphered sign. This is either bi/pi
with the hook on the wrong side, of the seldom used bu/pu.
If the former, the element would be abi "shaft",
as in Abiafelaisuraiki and Basque abe. If the latter, then
perhaps it is apu "bridge".
So the entire inscription should read: Mugei.
Ildirabi. Mai. "To the boundaries. Ildirabi. Inscription."
Another word often found in funerary inscriptions
is seldar. This means "grave, tomb", and is the same as
Basque zaldar "boil, pustule". The shift in meaning is
precisely analogous to Latin tumulus, which literally means
"little swelling".
With best wishes,
Angus J Huck